In contrast
to careful intellectually informed insight, it is common to let emotion and
passions dictate our positions on issues and guide our choices in making
important decisions. Like fear, emotion
and passion are not thought but rather reactive energy directed in a single
direction; as reactions they seek resolution through immediate action. By
nature, emotion cannot regard anything contrary to its desire; as a result, it
makes a poor basis for problem solving. Insight arises from an exhaustive
consideration of information from every possible perspective. The difference between these two modes is
also visible in the change society has undergone over the last several decades.
Increasingly, careful thinking in problem
solving has been pushed aside in favor of reactive action. Rather than take
time to carefully devise solutions to problems, the society has come to expect
leaders to take any action in the moment, regardless of its rectitude. With the
advent of the internet, social media, and the possibility these tools have
given average people to express immediate opinions without filtering, the
problem had been exasperated. These technological advances have placed the
individual person in the position of being capable to express their private
positions to many millions of other people in a moment; conversely, millions have
been given the opportunity to react and give their opinions on those positions.
When in
former times, writers had to study ethics, had an editor monitoring their words,
and were held accountable for their public opinions when they were in the
position to reach millions of people with their words, the new democratization
offered by social media is given without any real accountability being placed
on those who use it. The result is millions of people expressing their opinions
to each other, often without careful thought, and frequently motivated by
immediate emotion. The phenomenon itself acts like a feedback loop for the
society, pushing it for immediate action, immediate solutions, and emotional
responses to problems rather than intellectual solutions.
Slowly year
after year, the society seems to divide along emotional lines into warring
camps incapable of mutual understanding. Understanding requires thought; the
divisions are not thought based, but rather emotional. Many would disagree with this idea, stating
that their positions are very much based on ideas; nevertheless, the proof of
the statement lays in how they support their positions, without logic, but with
passion and hate for their opposition. Again, emotion and not thought. Currently, the material problems societies
face can be managed with a fair amount of effort in support of well thought out
plans; the greatest problem facing society is that passion and emotion are
dictating the course of events and this is preventing the society from uniting
and devising workable solutions to solve them.
No comments:
Post a Comment