The
motivation behind this project is simple: to present a series of art works in
the form of an exhibition which illuminates the concept of the ambiguous nature
of our nations, our history, our individualism, and the public personalities of
the people who have shaped our world. The impetus for this project has come from living in a period of time where
society has seemly taken a step backwards, becoming less cohesive and more
fractured; where groups stand categorically in opposition to their opponents
with a zero sum mentality informing the dialectic; ironically, each group
seemingly views itself as having moral authority and absolute possession over
some absolute truth, and yet this happens in the era of “fake news” where
perception is more important than fact.
Viewing this period from a side, it seems that most opposing groups are
not truly trying to achieve a result in the pursuit of an ideal, but rather to
see their opponents lose. The desire to simply win at any cost has become the
cause of an increasing divide between all segments of society, having led to
a situation where vital issues and real problems which all people face go unresolved
from a lack of cooperation. In this
context, in recent times, issues surrounding nations, history, and individualism
have become flash points for conflict with various sides taking extreme
positions. Again from the side, looking on at this situation, only the ambiguity
of these issues stands out; the lack of anything absolute is really their chief
characteristic. When the ambiguity of these issues is realized, that each issue
can actually be viewed in multiple ways, that each group can actually be
equally right and wrong at the same time, the basis for a deep and un-amicable
argument dissipates. It thus becomes the
motivation for this project to show the ambiguity in these issues, black and
white, good and evil simultaneously, without taking anyone’s part in any
argument. The project seeks to provide in its limited fashion, an example of
why there is little need for our current conflict, but rather the simple need
to acknowledge that while one may have his or her personal view that may be
very correct, others may also have their own which may be equally correct.

No comments:
Post a Comment